US Male Grand Slam Dry Spell Isn't Fritz's Responsibility to Bear

I have some opinions about the remarks delivered by the sports network broadcaster a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz during the US Open quarter-finals. Look – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the continued absence of American men at the majors: none of them has won a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But really. Suppose the American defeated the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the following match, whom Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually preferred his path, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best competitors in the world in succession. He is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the lack of US winners on the brain?

The American star's weaker delivery the only thing between her and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six matches over No 3 the German with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive power on both front side and backhand are sufficiently enough to dispose of most opponents on the professional circuit. Against the select few generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several years has witnessed the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his potential.

Fritz has achieved a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements throughout his career. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he suddenly surged up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in July.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been sufficient of an indication. Djokovic won in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American creating plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and forced him to use far too much effort to win it. Down set points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the contest two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The match was quite compelling evidence that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, more so than virtually everyone on the ATP except for Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

  • Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
  • The American contender
  • Alex de Minaur (Aus)
  • Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

  • Jannik Sinner (It)
  • The German powerhouse
  • Ben Shelton (US)
  • The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz told an interviewer in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he does not achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {

Allison Kirby
Allison Kirby

A passionate retro tech collector and writer, sharing discoveries and stories from the golden age of gaming and computing.