🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.